Structural drawing review, before site finds the problem.
Upload an Australian structural drawing pack and get a pinned issue register with severity, confidence, citations where they apply, and exports your team can work from.
Site queries
before pour
Drawing pack
50+ sheets
Output
pins + CSV/PDF
A drawing mark-up and register in the same workflow.
s.eye is not a generic chat window bolted onto PDFs. It produces review findings as structured, auditable work items tied back to the drawing sheet.
S03 - ground floor framing
Live drawing review
Finding SE-014
Transfer beam tags do not match schedule
Plan callout references TB2, while the beam schedule lists TB-02 with a different depth. Confirm member designation before issue.
Confidence
86%
Citation
Documentation
Three steps between upload and usable QA.
Built for firms that already know independent review matters, but need it to fit the pace of real project delivery.
01
Upload the pack
Drop in the structural PDF. s.eye prepares sheets in-browser, stores them privately, and starts the review without an email chain.
02
Run the second-pass review
Each sheet gets its own pass, then a cross-sheet review checks references, schedules, load paths, notation, and coordination.
03
Work the issue register
Findings land as drawing pins with severity, confidence, status, and citations where they apply. Resolve, dismiss with a reason, or export.
Built around Australian structural documentation.
Most AI review tools start with foreign code assumptions. s.eye is framed around Australian drawing conventions, NCC context, AS-series references, and the judgement of practising engineers.
- Citations are used conservatively; uncertain findings stay uncited.
- Scope can be holistic or targeted, so the output does not pretend to check more than it actually checked.
- Private storage, organisation membership, signed file URLs, and audit-friendly finding status changes.
NCC
National Construction Code
AS 3600
Concrete structures
AS 4100
Steel structures
AS 1170
Structural design actions
AS 3700
Masonry structures
AS 1684
Residential timber framing
The expensive mistakes are usually hiding in the gaps.
Coordination issues between notes, schedules, plans, sections, and details
Missing or ambiguous structural information before it reaches site
Targeted checks for foundations, lateral stability, seismic, connections, or custom scope
Draft Reg 126 certificate preparation with engineer-controlled sign-off
Waitlisted review packs, priced for real QA adoption.
Prices are in AUD and inclusive of GST. Billing can be switched on when the Stripe live setup is ready.
Trial
$0
Waitlist access
- 1 review pack
- Up to 50 sheets
- Full register and exports
- Early access invitation
Pro
$499 /mo
For active project teams
- 10 review packs / month
- 3 seats
- PDF and CSV report exports
- Permanent review history
AUD, GST inclusive
Consultancy
$999 /mo
For consultant QA workflows
- 30 review packs / month
- 10 seats
- Team review history
- Usage and token-cost visibility
AUD, GST inclusive
Clear boundary: review assistance, not certification.
s.eye helps prepare findings, registers, exports, and draft certificate material for an engineer-controlled process. It does not issue engineering certification, assume responsibility for design, or replace professional judgement.
Questions before the first pack.
- Is this engineering certification?
- No. s.eye is a review-assistance tool. Findings are not engineering certification and must be verified by a qualified engineer. It makes a second pass faster and cheaper; it does not replace the engineer who signs.
- Which projects is it for?
- Australian structural drawing packs where missed coordination has real cost: residential, commercial, industrial, education, insurance rebuilds, and consultant QA before issue.
- Will it invent standard clause references?
- No. A standard is cited only when the review can support it. If it is not confident, the finding stays uncited rather than inventing a clause number.
- What happens to our drawings?
- Drawings sit in your private organisation workspace. Files are accessed through short-lived signed URLs, and your organisation controls who can view the review.
- Can I narrow the review scope?
- Yes. Run a full review, or target foundations, lateral and seismic, gravity load path, connections, or a custom instruction for a specific engineering concern.
- Do I need a demo?
- Not yet. Public account creation is waitlisted while real project packs are tested. Existing testers can still sign in, and invited users can create accounts through their invite link.
Give the next structural pack a second pair of eyes.
Join the waitlist while public access is gated for real-pack testing.